Small Property Owners Association

Defeating Rent Control: A Constitutional Victory for Property Rights (Letter from the President)

Dear SPOA Members and Supporters:

I am writing to follow up on the significant news regarding our recent legal challenge in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. As many of you are aware, the Court has ruled in our favor by striking down the rent control ballot initiative.

While some might seek to frame this outcome as merely a technicality, I want to be clear: this is a profound constitutional victory. 

We challenged the ballot question on six distinct counts, and our success validates the rigorous legal strategy we employed. This was not a minor procedural correction — it was a necessary defense of our state’s constitutional order under Article 48.

Our challenge successfully highlighted that the proposed measure would have necessitated egregious government overreach. Had it proceeded, it would have required the state to conduct intrusive, deep-dive audits of religious organizations and their properties to determine their "religious nature" — a process that is not only unconstitutional, but a fundamental violation of religious liberty and privacy rights. By blocking this, the Court upheld the principle that our government cannot force its way into the private operations of religious institutions to achieve a regulatory end.

It is also important to remember that we reached this outcome by standing firm. Throughout this process, there were opportunities to accept a "compromise," which was, in reality, nothing more than a negotiated surrender of our principles. We chose not to fold.

Our momentum was undeniable. Recent polling indicated that support for rent control had dropped from 60% to 49% — a clear sign that our campaign was shifting public sentiment even before the Court delivered its ruling. By rejecting that "compromise" and pursuing this challenge through the proper legal channels, we have protected the integrity of our association and the rights of property owners across the state.

This represents the most definitive win for property rights in a generation, standing as a landmark achievement on par with SPOA's success in overturning rent control at the ballot box in 1994.

Our success here is a testament to the persistence and commitment of SPOA, and we could not have achieved this victory without your help! We are also honored to share this victory with everyone in our coalition, Housing for Massachusetts, without whom this victory would not have been possible. 

This momentous victory validated our multi-pronged approach of legislative testimony, media advocacy, and legal action. 

Thank you for your continued support as we keep advocating for a fair and stable environment for all small property owners, while helping renters and other stakeholders throughout Massachusetts.

Sincerely,

Amir Shahsavari 
President
Small Property Owners Association (SPOA)

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does SPOA call this a constitutional victory for property rights?

SPOA calls this a constitutional victory because the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court struck down the rent control ballot initiative after SPOA challenged it under Article 48 and other constitutional grounds.

What did the Court’s ruling do to the rent control ballot initiative?

The Court’s ruling struck down the rent control ballot initiative, preventing it from moving forward in its proposed form.

Why did SPOA oppose the rent control ballot initiative?

SPOA opposed the initiative because it believed the proposal would harm small property owners, weaken property rights, distort housing policy, and create unconstitutional government overreach.

What role did Housing for Massachusetts play in this victory?

Housing for Massachusetts worked with SPOA and coalition partners on the broader campaign against rent control, including public education, media advocacy, and opposition to the ballot initiative.

Contact your legislator | Join SPOA | 93A guide | Legal tracker